Friday, August 3, 2007

Defining and Extracting Value in Change

One of the problems in India today is our disinclination towards drastic change. We often choose to take the path more travelled and thereby bereft of risk. While this evolutionary methodology give us the stability we expound with so much pride, I believe that we should also chance the odd revolutionary change.

This brings about the question, why should we support change. It could be risky. We could lose all that we have cherished and protected. Is it worth the risk? I think the answer to this question is unlocked by determining the value in change. Value in itself could be short term or long term.

As an illustration, for decades India struggled with what was termed as a Hindu rate of growth resulting in a languishing economy, while the Asian tigers were roaring. Given a young population, this was shocking, but not unexplainable. Manmohan Singh's opening of the till then protectionist economy has shown spectacular results over the past decade and a half. But at the time of implementing this change, there were enough vocal nay-sayers that even the most ardent lobbyists of the free economy would have crumbled into self doubt. But the result of this change is well known.

Let's study another example. India is facing crumbling infrastructure. Our inheritance from the colonialists is all but dying and has neither been improved nor sustained. Yes, we hear about new airports and highways. But take it down to the streets and you notice two things.

1. Lack of proper well designed and laid out pavements.

2. Lack of well laid out roads and systems that allow free vehicular traffic

The resulting situation is that the pedestrian is watching every step he takes to ensure that he does not inadvertently visit an open manhole or drain and the motorist is weaving across the road to avoid a pothole or another unplanned urban obstacle. This is of course on streets that have some semblance of pavements and roads. Many have neither.

The outcome is that, the citizen is busy looking down at the pavement/road rather than looking ahead. I believe that this act of self preservation is what prevents us from looking ahead and walking tall. Our psyche has been damaged to an extent that we tend to look down and inward rather than up and outward and therefore tend to defer change rather than embrace it, withdraw from aggressors rather than meet the challenge and shift blame rather than accept responsibility. Good infrastructure can inspire and challenge people to raise the bar and to achieve objectives they may not have envisioned before.

If we extend the same concept to the work place, we will notice many similar situations. Have you ever wondered why this particular team member is low on motivation or why that particular project is languishing? The reason sometimes may be due to an inward view instead of outward and therefore there may be change opportunities that are being ignored!

Do they have the right tools, the right skills, the right manager, the right assistance. Are factors at the workplace, may be lighting or could be the coffee machine hampering people from asking the right questions, the questions that drive change?

Sunday, June 17, 2007

The War of the Consoles

A few weeks back I realized that I had become a dinosaur as far as the world of gaming was concerned. The last game I had played was over 10 years ago on my Intel Pentium PC, the Lucas Arts smash hit, Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis. Playing a puzzle game without the benefit of a walk-through gives a completely different gaming experience that gamers today may find interesting. Enough nostalgia!

An ex-gamers re-union resulted in one of my friends, Ashwin, bringing over his X-Box. A few hours of playing with it, A sad truth dawned. The PC was dead as far as gaming was concerned. Inspired by the X-Box another friend bought a PS2. Now before you say, "hey there, don't you know that the X-Box 360 and the PS3 are out. Go get one and do some real gaming", let me delve further into the heart of my post.

10 years ago, if my friend had a fun game, I could swap it with him and we could both play. Gaming 10 years ago was not a multi-billion dollar industry that it is today. Microsoft was just getting in to the turf hitherto ruled by Id, EA to name a few. It is also not that consoles did not exist, they very much did. My first games were in fact played on an old Atari console. So there, let get all those assumptions out of the way.

Cut to today. My friend on the PS2 can't swap his games with my X-Box friend. The controllers are vastly different. However the consoles themselves are not much cheaper, At about Rs. 16,000 for an X-Box 360 and Rs. 32,000 for a PS3, these things are not exactly cheap. A game costs anywhere between Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 3,500 and online gaming is the rage!

All of which reminds me of enterprise hardware vendors such as Digital, IBM and HP, who in the 60's, 70's and 80's tried very hard to lock their customers to a particular platform. History while noting their success for a good 30 years also records their eventual convergence. A matter driven more by market forces and less by noble thoughts.

I believe that a similar situation is going to occur on the console front as well. While companies such as Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo will try hard to lock their customers into their consoles and have/will succeed in the short term, in the long run, convergence is inevitable. The field is ripe for gaming standards. Its in the interest of consumers and media companies who create these games. It offers unparalleled gaming convenience for the former and access to larger markets for the latter. I am sure every X-Box'r has a PS2 friend who he wanted to play against.

Already mod-chips, allow gamers to unlock the potential of their consoles. Emulators allow PC gamers to play console games. It is only a matter of time before we see universal consoles. What shall we name them? PoX? or XS2?

The future holds exciting options. Will the console lords listen?

Friday, May 18, 2007

Hello World

That was the first program I wrote in programming class. Nostalgia. Sigh. Well, This is my Business Blog. Where I will rant, rave and otherwise pontificate about my few capabilities.

The broad topics for this blog will be

1. GMAT (everyone should be able to crack this and how I almost did)
2. Business
3. Business Schools and how to get into one. (or at least my attempts at it)
4. Management (Why things work and some don't)